Biomedical
Robin Umbra,
Ulrike Fasbender
Peer Reviewed
Our research seeks to contribute to the existing literature on emotion measurement and research by proposing a new anger metric that addresses limitations of previous scales. This metric shows promise in meeting modern standards and drawing from traditional methods, potentially impacting the study of emotions. Additionally, our study explores cross-cultural congruence in assessing anger between English and German speakers, revealing differences in state and trait anger assessment. We offer theoretical perspectives on these cultural variances and emphasize the importance of considering language nuances in cross-cultural emotion assessment. Furthermore, our research delves into the relationship between anger and other emotions within an affective space, suggesting support for the notion that emotions are composite constructs consisting of valence and activation. We also discuss alternative theoretical perspectives on emotion construction to enhance our understanding. Additionally, our study examines the intricate relationship between anger and different forms of aggression, highlighting the association between anger and various aggressive behaviors in work settings. Our findings underscore the influence of personal traits and situational factors on experiences of anger and aggression, offering insights into the relationships between emotional states, traits, and behavior.
State anger refers to the temporary emotional condition characterized by feelings of tension, annoyance, or rage. Unlike trait anger, which is a personality characteristic, state anger is a transient response to specific situations or stimuli.
Assessing state anger is crucial for understanding how individuals react to various situations, which can inform interventions in clinical psychology, conflict resolution, and stress management. Accurate measurement of state anger can help in developing strategies to manage and reduce anger-related responses.
The researchers designed the assessment tool by identifying key indicators of state anger and creating items that reflect these indicators. The tool was then tested across different cultural groups to ensure its reliability and validity in measuring state anger universally.
The study found that expressions of state anger vary across cultures, influenced by cultural norms and language nuances. These differences underscore the importance of considering cultural context when assessing and interpreting state anger, as cultural factors can affect how anger is experienced and expressed.
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 January | 3 | 3 |
Total | 3 | 3 |
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 January | 3 | 3 |
Total | 3 | 3 |