Biomedical

Effects of Reference Group Instructions on Big Five Trait Scores




  Peer Reviewed

Abstract

People responding to personality questionnaires rate themselves by comparing themselves to some reference group, but this reference group is typically not specified. In this study, we examined the differences between Big Five trait scores when people responded to trait questionnaires without a specified reference group, as is typical in personality assessment, and when they were asked to compare themselves to people in general, close others, people their age, people their same gender, their ideal self, or their past self. We found that personality scores tended to be more adaptive for between-person comparisons than for within-person comparisons. We also found that unprompted instructions produced mildly higher scores across all traits. There were few differences among between-person reference group conditions. Men rated themselves as slightly more agreeable when comparing themselves to other men. Implications for basic and applied personality assessment are discussed.

Key Questions

What is the Big Five personality trait model?

The Big Five personality trait model is a widely accepted framework that categorizes human personality into five dimensions: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. These traits are used to describe and measure individual differences in behavior and personality.

How do reference groups affect personality assessments?

Reference groups serve as a comparative baseline when individuals assess their own personality traits. The study found that specifying different reference groups (e.g., people in general, close others, same-age peers) can lead to variations in self-reported Big Five trait scores. This suggests that the context provided by the reference group influences how individuals perceive and report their own personality characteristics.

What were the main findings of the study?

The researchers discovered that personality scores varied depending on the reference group specified. Specifically, when individuals compared themselves to others (between-person comparisons), their trait scores tended to be more adaptive than when they compared themselves to their ideal or past selves (within-person comparisons). This indicates that the choice of reference group can significantly impact the outcomes of personality assessments.

Why is understanding the impact of reference groups important in personality assessment?

Recognizing how different reference groups influence personality assessments is crucial for both researchers and practitioners. It highlights the need for clear and consistent reference frames when administering and interpreting personality questionnaires to ensure accurate and meaningful results. This understanding can improve the reliability of personality assessments and their applications in various fields, such as psychology, human resources, and counseling.