Humanities and Arts
Contextual felicity constraints refer to the conditions under which presupposition triggers can be felicitously used in a given context. Some presupposition triggers can be used even when their presuppositions are not entailed by the context, while others are infelicitous in such environments. This variation is known as Missing Accommodation or Informative Presupposition.
Wilcox's study provides empirical data on the relative CFC strength of thirteen presupposition triggers, offering a comprehensive cross-trigger comparison. The results support a three-way categorical analysis of presupposition triggers, based on imposing strong, weak, or no CFCs. This categorization enhances our understanding of how different presupposition triggers behave in various contexts.
The study observes that strong CFC triggers are all focus-associating, suggesting that variation in behavior arises due to naturally occurring semantic classes. This finding implies that the association with focus may influence the felicity of presupposition triggers in different contexts.
Wilcox compares his results to three previous proposals for CFC variation and argues that none yet account for the full empirical picture. This critique highlights the need for a more comprehensive understanding of how presupposition triggers interact with contextual felicity constraints.
By addressing these questions, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of the semantics of presupposition triggers and their interaction with contextual felicity constraints, offering insights that align with recent empirical findings in the field.
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 February | 9 | 9 |
2025 January | 68 | 68 |
2024 December | 15 | 15 |
Total | 92 | 92 |
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 February | 9 | 9 |
2025 January | 68 | 68 |
2024 December | 15 | 15 |
Total | 92 | 92 |