Biomedical
Fixing science means an end to gaming the system
Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002816
Abstract
Summary:
During the last decade, there has been a substantial acceleration in the open science movement. Most people would probably hope to have seen signs of positive change in that time, yet it seems that the process of improving the practice of science is moving at a glacial pace. Nicholas J. L. Brown's article highlights that, despite the growth of the open science movement and tools facilitating research transparency, significant issues persist in scientific publishing. The prevalence of superficial adherence to open science practices and the rarity of Registered Reports indicate that systemic changes are necessary. To advance towards more open and reproducible research, the scientific community must address misaligned incentives and promote genuine adoption of transparent practices. The article "Fixing Science Means an End to Gaming the System" by Nicholas J. L. Brown (2024) examines the persistent challenges in scientific research practices, despite advancements in the open science movement. Below are key questions addressed in the study:Key Questions
1. What progress has been made in the open science movement over the past decade?
Over the past decade, there has been a substantial acceleration in the open science movement, with over 350 journals adopting Registered Reports and increased interest among younger researchers.
2. Despite these advancements, why does scientific publishing still face challenges?
Despite these advancements, the reality of scientific publishing has not changed significantly; Registered Reports remain the exception, and many claims of adopting open science practices are often superficial.
3. What are the main obstacles hindering the progress of open and reproducible research?
The main obstacles include misaligned incentives that encourage researchers to prioritize quantity over quality, leading to practices that undermine the integrity and reproducibility of scientific research.
4. How can the scientific community address these challenges to improve research practices?
The scientific community can address these challenges by realigning incentives to reward quality and transparency, promoting the adoption of Registered Reports, and fostering a culture that values reproducibility and openness in research.
Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002816