Social Science
Esther Adeniran,
Esther Adeniran
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
Megan Quinn,
Megan Quinn
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States
Richard Wallace,
Richard Wallace
Quillen College of Medicine Library, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States
Rachel R. Walden,
Rachel R. Walden
Quillen College of Medicine Library, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States
Titilola Labisi,
Titilola Labisi
Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States
Afolakemi Olaniyan,
Afolakemi Olaniyan
Department of Health Promotion and Education, School of Human Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Robert Pack,
Robert Pack
Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States
Billy Brooks
Billy Brooks
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, United States
Peer Reviewed
Background Following the national implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014, barriers still exist that limit the adoption of substance use treatment (SUT) services in mainstream health care (MHC) settings in the United States. This study provides an overview of current evidence on barriers and facilitators to integrating various SUT services into MHC. Methods A systematic search was conducted with the following databases: “PubMed including MEDLINE”, “CINAHL”, “Web of Science”, “ABI/Inform”, and “PsycINFO.” We identified barriers and/or facilitators affecting patients, providers, and programs/systems. Results Of the 540 identified citations, 36 were included. Main barriers were identified for patients (socio-demographics, finances, confidentiality, legal impact, and disinterest), providers (limited training, lack of time, patient satisfaction concerns, legal implications, lack of access to resources or evidence-based information, and lack of legal/regulatory clarity), and programs/systems (lack of leadership support, lack of staff, limited financial resources, lack of referral networks, lack of space, and lack of state-level support). Also, we recognized key facilitators pertaining to patients (trust for providers, education, and shared decision making), providers (expert supervision, use of support team, training with programs like Extension for Community Health Outcomes (ECHO), and receptivity), and programs/systems (leadership support, collaboration with external agencies, and policies e.g., those expanding the addiction workforce, improving insurance access and treatment access). Conclusions This study identified several factors influencing the integration of SUT services in MHC. Strategies for improving SUT integration in MHC should address barriers and leverage facilitators related to patients, providers, and programs/systems.
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2024 December | 27 | 27 |
2024 November | 44 | 44 |
2024 October | 52 | 52 |
2024 September | 41 | 41 |
2024 August | 30 | 30 |
2024 July | 33 | 33 |
2024 June | 22 | 22 |
2024 May | 35 | 35 |
2024 April | 21 | 21 |
2024 March | 7 | 7 |
Total | 312 | 312 |
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2024 December | 27 | 27 |
2024 November | 44 | 44 |
2024 October | 52 | 52 |
2024 September | 41 | 41 |
2024 August | 30 | 30 |
2024 July | 33 | 33 |
2024 June | 22 | 22 |
2024 May | 35 | 35 |
2024 April | 21 | 21 |
2024 March | 7 | 7 |
Total | 312 | 312 |