RNfinity
Research Infinity Logo, Orange eye of horus, white eye of Ra
  • Home
  • Submit
    Research Articles
    Ebooks
  • Articles
    Academic
    Ebooks
  • Info
    Home
    Subject
    Submit
    About
    News
    Submission Guide
    Contact Us
  • Login/sign up
    Login
    Register

Physics Maths Engineering

Environmental Impact of Plastic Recycling in Terms of Energy Consumption: A Comparison of Japan’s Mechanical and Chemical Recycling Technologies

rnfinity

info@rnfinity.com

orcid logo

Chaoxia Shan,

Chaoxia Shan

Graduate School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 1620041, Japan


Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo,

Andante Hadi Pandyaswargo

Environmental Research Institute, Waseda University, Tokyo 1620041, Japan


Hiroshi Onoda

Hiroshi Onoda

Graduate School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 1620041, Japan


  Peer Reviewed

copyright icon

© attribution CC-BY

  • 0

rating
580 Views

Added on

2024-12-20

Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052199

Related Subjects
Physics
Math
Chemistry
Computer science
Engineering
Earth science
Biology

Abstract

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impact of plastic recycling in Japan by comparing mechanical recycling with two chemical recycling technologies: coke oven and gasification. The analysis focuses on energy consumption and environmental loads, revealing that mechanical recycling results in a 17% share of global warming potential (GWP), coke oven 51%, and gasification 32%. While mechanical recycling has a lower GWP, chemical recycling produces valuable byproducts like steam and industrial water, which can be reused to reduce overall environmental impact.

Key Questions

1. What are the environmental impacts of mechanical versus chemical plastic recycling methods?

The study found that mechanical recycling has a lower global warming potential (17% GWP) compared to chemical recycling methods like coke oven (51% GWP) and gasification (32% GWP). However, chemical recycling produces valuable byproducts that can be reused, potentially offsetting some environmental impacts.

2. How does energy consumption differ between mechanical and chemical recycling technologies?

Mechanical recycling consumes less energy compared to chemical recycling methods. The study indicates that chemical recycling methods like coke oven and gasification have higher energy consumption, contributing to their higher global warming potential.

3. What are the benefits of byproducts generated from chemical recycling?

Chemical recycling yields byproducts such as steam and industrial water, which can be reused within the process or in other industrial applications. This reuse can reduce the overall environmental load and contribute to industrial symbiosis ecosystems.

4. Why is it important to compare different plastic recycling technologies?

Comparing recycling technologies helps identify the most energy-efficient and environmentally friendly methods. Understanding these differences aids in making informed decisions to promote sustainable practices in plastic waste management.

5. What are the primary limitations of energy storage as a technology?

The primary limitation of energy storage technology is cost. Additionally, reliability and the ability to scale are significant barriers that need to be addressed to enhance the benefits to power utilities. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

6. How does energy storage contribute to renewable energy integration?

Energy storage systems help address the intermittency of renewable energy sources like solar and wind by storing excess energy and releasing it when needed, thereby stabilizing the grid and ensuring a consistent energy supply. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

Summary Video Not Available

Review 0

Login

ARTICLE USAGE


Article usage: Dec-2024 to May-2025
Show by month Manuscript Video Summary
2025 May 153 153
2025 April 101 101
2025 March 92 92
2025 February 102 102
2025 January 97 97
2024 December 35 35
Total 580 580
Show by month Manuscript Video Summary
2025 May 153 153
2025 April 101 101
2025 March 92 92
2025 February 102 102
2025 January 97 97
2024 December 35 35
Total 580 580
Related Subjects
Physics
Math
Chemistry
Computer science
Engineering
Earth science
Biology
copyright icon

© attribution CC-BY

  • 0

rating
580 Views

Added on

2024-12-20

Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052199

Related Subjects
Physics
Math
Chemistry
Computer science
Engineering
Earth science
Biology

Follow Us

  • Xicon
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

5 Braemore Court, London EN4 0AE, Telephone +442082758777

© Copyright 2025 All Rights Reserved.