Physics Maths Engineering
Rakhee Ramachandran,
Yadira Bajón Fernández,
Ian Truckell,
Carlos Constantino,
Richard Casselden,
Paul Leinster,
Mónica Rivas Casado
Peer Reviewed
The article "Accuracy Assessment of Surveying Strategies for the Characterization of Microtopographic Features That Influence Surface Water Flooding" evaluates two common surveying methods used in flood studies:
The study assesses the elevation differences and accuracy levels between these methods across various land uses and microtopographic flood features. Findings indicate that elevation differences between S1 and S2 range from 11 cm to 37 cm, with S1 accuracy varying between 3 cm and 70 cm, and S2 accuracy between 3.8 cm and 30.3 cm. These results suggest that the choice of surveying strategy should be tailored to the specific flood features under investigation. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
The study found that UAS with RGB imaging (S1) and manned aircraft with LiDAR scanning (S2) differ in elevation measurements, with differences ranging from 11 cm to 37 cm across various land uses and flood features. Accuracy levels also vary, with S1 ranging from 3 cm to 70 cm and S2 from 3.8 cm to 30.3 cm. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
The choice between UAS with RGB imaging and manned aircraft with LiDAR scanning should be based on the specific flood features of interest, as each method offers distinct advantages and limitations depending on the microtopographic characteristics of the area. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 April | 8 | 8 |
2025 March | 65 | 65 |
2025 February | 52 | 52 |
2025 January | 44 | 44 |
2024 December | 67 | 67 |
2024 November | 75 | 75 |
Total | 311 | 311 |
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 April | 8 | 8 |
2025 March | 65 | 65 |
2025 February | 52 | 52 |
2025 January | 44 | 44 |
2024 December | 67 | 67 |
2024 November | 75 | 75 |
Total | 311 | 311 |