Social Science
J.E.H. Kusters,
J.E.H. Kusters
University of Groningen, Department of Spatial Planning & Environment, Landleven 1, 9747 AD, Groningen, the Netherlands
F.M.G. van Kann,
F.M.G. van Kann
University of Groningen, Department of Spatial Planning & Environment, Landleven 1, 9747 AD, Groningen, the Netherlands
C. Zuidema
C. Zuidema
University of Groningen, Department of Spatial Planning & Environment, Landleven 1, 9747 AD, Groningen, the Netherlands
Peer Reviewed
The foreseen large-scale growth of offshore wind energy towards 2050 in pursuit of an energy transition obliges scholars and policymakers to start considering its integration in the wider offshore energy system. Both technological innovations and advances in spatial policy are necessary to facilitate offshore system integration. This study draws from agenda-setting theory to explore barriers and opportunities affecting the prioritization processes surrounding three offshore energy storage and transport concepts in Dutch marine spatial planning practice. The findings demonstrate that although various arenas for agenda-setting exist, they are geared to the input of established stakeholders, including the oil and gas and offshore wind sectors. Also, prioritization is hindered by a short-term (2030) governmental fixation and long-term institutional ambiguity. Therefore, supportive institutions are needed, providing regulatory certainty and reliable incentive mechanisms, whilst remaining adaptive to address imminent uncertainties, in pursuit of system integration needed for an energy transition.
The Netherlands is planning large-scale growth of offshore wind energy by 2050 as part of its energy transition. This growth requires integrating offshore wind with other energy systems, such as storage and transport, to ensure efficiency and sustainability.
Challenges include short-term government focus (e.g., targets for 2030), long-term institutional uncertainty, and the dominance of established stakeholders like the oil and gas industry. These factors hinder the prioritization of innovative energy storage and transport solutions.
The study highlights three key concepts: offshore energy storage, energy transport, and system integration. These are essential for creating a cohesive offshore energy system that supports the transition to renewable energy.
Marine spatial planning plays a critical role in allocating space and resources for offshore wind projects. However, current practices often prioritize established industries, making it harder for new technologies and concepts to gain traction.
Established stakeholders, such as the oil and gas sector, dominate decision-making processes, often sidelining newer technologies and smaller players. This creates barriers to innovation and the integration of renewable energy solutions.
Agenda-setting theory explores how issues are prioritized in policy and planning. In offshore energy, it reveals that current processes favor short-term goals and established industries, making it difficult to advance long-term, innovative solutions.
Barriers include regulatory uncertainty, lack of incentives, and institutional ambiguity. These issues prevent the prioritization of offshore energy storage and transport concepts in marine spatial planning.
Policymakers can support integration by creating supportive institutions, providing regulatory certainty, and developing reliable incentive mechanisms. These measures should remain flexible to address future uncertainties and technological advancements.
Opportunities include developing new technologies for energy storage and transport, fostering collaboration between industries, and aligning marine spatial planning with long-term energy transition goals.
Long-term planning is essential to address institutional ambiguity, align policies with 2050 energy transition goals, and ensure the integration of offshore wind energy with other renewable energy systems.
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 March | 28 | 28 |
2025 February | 44 | 44 |
2025 January | 43 | 43 |
2024 December | 45 | 45 |
2024 November | 47 | 47 |
2024 October | 39 | 39 |
2024 September | 52 | 52 |
2024 August | 36 | 36 |
2024 July | 37 | 37 |
2024 June | 26 | 26 |
2024 May | 31 | 31 |
2024 April | 25 | 25 |
2024 March | 7 | 7 |
Total | 460 | 460 |
Show by month | Manuscript | Video Summary |
---|---|---|
2025 March | 28 | 28 |
2025 February | 44 | 44 |
2025 January | 43 | 43 |
2024 December | 45 | 45 |
2024 November | 47 | 47 |
2024 October | 39 | 39 |
2024 September | 52 | 52 |
2024 August | 36 | 36 |
2024 July | 37 | 37 |
2024 June | 26 | 26 |
2024 May | 31 | 31 |
2024 April | 25 | 25 |
2024 March | 7 | 7 |
Total | 460 | 460 |